I liked the whole "GET IT IN WRITING" statement regarding having promises made to RFK placed in writing, but I had to stop listening when "Eduardo Sanchez Abarca", who kept reminding us that he is in Mexico, started talking at length about his open borders position, saying, at one point that "we should all be undocumented illegal aliens". Ugh.
I'm glad Michael Kane pushed back and said that he wasn't for open borders. And maybe someone should tell Eduardo that Ernesto (Che) Guevara HIMSELF was arrested IN MEXICO for being ILLEGALLY IN MEXICO. Mexico has historically had stricter border enforcement than the U.S.!
Anyway, we have a lot of WORK to do on the grassroots level to fight medical tyranny, and we should NOT conflate and confuse that with trying to help people illegally coming to the U.S. Does Eduardo seriously believe that Mexicans are just entitled to come to the U.S.?! He definitely sounds like an open borders advocate. It sounds like Eduardo had a hidden agenda here.
Eduardo is an anarchist. He believes there should be no borders and no required ID and all travel should be open and free.
I don't agree with that as I believe it is impractical and dangerous.
But Eduardo's LARGER point that the SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY ON THE BORDER IS DANGEROUS definitely caught my attention. I plan to look into this deeper.
We have to gain control over the border and people illegally in the U.S. Many come through other means, like overstaying their visas, which is a BIG ONE. I do NOT oppose the use of technology at the border to end this madness. I also actually think militarizing the border would be a great idea, since many of these trespassers would understand that forceful display. The U.S. military is ALREADY in other countries, ostensibly to protect other countries' borders! As I am sure you know.
We should NOT fixate on surveillance tech *at the border*......There is surveillance technology in the medical field, as well as surveillance technology over our own citizenry, and I oppose it in these (and other) areas. As health freedom activists, we should oppose surveillance technology when it comes to our health and start there. Many open border activists, like Eduardo, want us to lose touch with our mission and start helping THEM and their agenda, which is a naive agenda AT BEST.
As far as being an "anarchist", I have long ago stopped looking at what people self-label as, and just look at what they say and do, and, more importantly, if what they "do" matches what they say. Some self-labeled "anarchists" are NOT for open borders, for example, so I gave him a chance.
Right now, there is a health surveillance system called Healthix which is monitoring and collecting health information from your past and present, regardless of whether a person knows about it or has consented to it. Right now, there are hand and finger biometric imaging being done in the medical care industry in NYC, which most people robotically comply with.
Michael, I can definitely see that you were a teacher...you have patience with people I would not have! NYC schools definitely lost a good one when they lost you! But Eduardo is not a child, at least not chronologically, and his open border agenda is DANGEROUS for us!
Yikes! Did you actually read my comment above in its entirety?! I wrote that biometrics are already in the U.S., already used in the medical industry, already used against our citizenry. I cited the health surveillance system already used in the U.S. I also specifically talk about the hand and finger biometrics used in the medical industry here right now in NYC....all of which is where we should be directing our attention as health freedom activists concerned about surveillance.
And, no, the border was a problem long before Biden. And, no, the border has NOT been secured for "a century". Additionally, the visa overstayers are a HUGE PROBLEM, which I mentioned above.
2 DIFFERENT ISSUES! I trust you are informed on the health freedom front, but I see loopholes in your thinking on the issue of those illegally here. Holes that, if you aren't careful, people with agendas like Eduardo, can jump through. He has already started....be wary of those who act "nice" but want something. His part in the Video was largely distracting from the substance of the health freedom fight, which was likely an intentional distraction.
Great discussion! I'm more confused than ever. I have many issues with Trump (his Covid response was poor, and he wants credit for it). And his endless bragging really rubs me the wrong way. Still, much preferable to Harris.
In the Rogan interview, Trump brought up an interesting point related to THIS discussion of Kennedy-as-independent. He said that can't work, because you need Congress's support to get anything done. So ultimately you need to be aligned with donkeys or elephants.
If we're taking votes on the border, count me in as wanting more security and gradual immigration.
I liked the whole "GET IT IN WRITING" statement regarding having promises made to RFK placed in writing, but I had to stop listening when "Eduardo Sanchez Abarca", who kept reminding us that he is in Mexico, started talking at length about his open borders position, saying, at one point that "we should all be undocumented illegal aliens". Ugh.
I'm glad Michael Kane pushed back and said that he wasn't for open borders. And maybe someone should tell Eduardo that Ernesto (Che) Guevara HIMSELF was arrested IN MEXICO for being ILLEGALLY IN MEXICO. Mexico has historically had stricter border enforcement than the U.S.!
Anyway, we have a lot of WORK to do on the grassroots level to fight medical tyranny, and we should NOT conflate and confuse that with trying to help people illegally coming to the U.S. Does Eduardo seriously believe that Mexicans are just entitled to come to the U.S.?! He definitely sounds like an open borders advocate. It sounds like Eduardo had a hidden agenda here.
Eduardo is an anarchist. He believes there should be no borders and no required ID and all travel should be open and free.
I don't agree with that as I believe it is impractical and dangerous.
But Eduardo's LARGER point that the SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY ON THE BORDER IS DANGEROUS definitely caught my attention. I plan to look into this deeper.
We have to gain control over the border and people illegally in the U.S. Many come through other means, like overstaying their visas, which is a BIG ONE. I do NOT oppose the use of technology at the border to end this madness. I also actually think militarizing the border would be a great idea, since many of these trespassers would understand that forceful display. The U.S. military is ALREADY in other countries, ostensibly to protect other countries' borders! As I am sure you know.
We should NOT fixate on surveillance tech *at the border*......There is surveillance technology in the medical field, as well as surveillance technology over our own citizenry, and I oppose it in these (and other) areas. As health freedom activists, we should oppose surveillance technology when it comes to our health and start there. Many open border activists, like Eduardo, want us to lose touch with our mission and start helping THEM and their agenda, which is a naive agenda AT BEST.
As far as being an "anarchist", I have long ago stopped looking at what people self-label as, and just look at what they say and do, and, more importantly, if what they "do" matches what they say. Some self-labeled "anarchists" are NOT for open borders, for example, so I gave him a chance.
Right now, there is a health surveillance system called Healthix which is monitoring and collecting health information from your past and present, regardless of whether a person knows about it or has consented to it. Right now, there are hand and finger biometric imaging being done in the medical care industry in NYC, which most people robotically comply with.
Michael, I can definitely see that you were a teacher...you have patience with people I would not have! NYC schools definitely lost a good one when they lost you! But Eduardo is not a child, at least not chronologically, and his open border agenda is DANGEROUS for us!
They can secure the border WITHOUT massive invasions of privacy rights of anyone. They did it for a century.
Biden has helped create a 'problem' that now requiem a SOLUTION that they already wanted to roll out BEFORE they created the problem.
If you think biotechnology at the border WILL STAY at the border I belive that is foolish
Yikes! Did you actually read my comment above in its entirety?! I wrote that biometrics are already in the U.S., already used in the medical industry, already used against our citizenry. I cited the health surveillance system already used in the U.S. I also specifically talk about the hand and finger biometrics used in the medical industry here right now in NYC....all of which is where we should be directing our attention as health freedom activists concerned about surveillance.
And, no, the border was a problem long before Biden. And, no, the border has NOT been secured for "a century". Additionally, the visa overstayers are a HUGE PROBLEM, which I mentioned above.
2 DIFFERENT ISSUES! I trust you are informed on the health freedom front, but I see loopholes in your thinking on the issue of those illegally here. Holes that, if you aren't careful, people with agendas like Eduardo, can jump through. He has already started....be wary of those who act "nice" but want something. His part in the Video was largely distracting from the substance of the health freedom fight, which was likely an intentional distraction.
Great discussion! I'm more confused than ever. I have many issues with Trump (his Covid response was poor, and he wants credit for it). And his endless bragging really rubs me the wrong way. Still, much preferable to Harris.
In the Rogan interview, Trump brought up an interesting point related to THIS discussion of Kennedy-as-independent. He said that can't work, because you need Congress's support to get anything done. So ultimately you need to be aligned with donkeys or elephants.
If we're taking votes on the border, count me in as wanting more security and gradual immigration.
I support border security. But BIOMETRIC TECH and GEO FENCING is much different. They will turn it on EVERYONE eventually.
I disagree with Trump’s opinion of an independent President. I don't thi k just anyone could pull it off, but Bobby could have imo
An Open Letter to Your Friend or Relative Planning to Vote for Trump: You’re Endorsing the Worst of America.
Your Vote for Trump Is an Endorsement of Bigotry, Cruelty, and the Erosion of Rights—No Matter the Reason You Give.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-150725410?r=4d7sow&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web