Personally I do believe multiple toxins in vaccines make people sick - and so do the antigens at times. However some vaccines do stop the wide spread circulation of specific infections. In particular the measles and varicella (chickenpox) shots do seem to stop the wild virus from circulating.
That is probably NOT a good thing (for many reasons) but it does seem to be the reality we live in today.
I worked in NYC schools for 14 years, and not once did I see a single case of chicken pox. I've seen science teacher do informal surveys of their classes on this topic and they would find 1 in 200 students had ever gotten chicken pox - or sometimes had ever even heard of the disease.
The medical freedom movement really should be extremely critical and honest of all the facts as they present themselves. It doesn't help us to over-state beliefs as facts in my opinion.
It's a great point that no difference in health outcomes is seen when comparing states with exemptions to states without them. There's your undeniable proof. Brilliant!
“I was sicker than I ever was. That proves it was a virus”, or “I lost my taste and smell. That proves it was a virus”, or “Sally and Johnny both got sick at a chickenpox party. That proves it was a virus”, they are committing 3 logical fallacies in one:
Begging the question,
a reification fallacy,
and affirming the consequent.
In order to say that X causes Y, you must first prove the existence of X. X, in the case of virology, hasn’t been proven.
You can’t assume that X exists (begging the question), then proceed to assign characteristics, properties, or behaviors to it (a reification fallacy), and then point to effects as proof of the cause (affirming the consequent).
Further, just because we don’t know with certainty what did cause Y (and we have plenty of plausible explanations), doesn’t mean we revert back to accepting the unproven (arguably disproven) premise that X causes Y because we don’t know the true culprit. Falsification doesn’t require a replacement.
Saying “well since you can’t tell me what did cause [Y], it must’ve been a virus” is equivalent to this:
Albert says he saw Bill murder Chuck at the gas station down the street from Bill’s apartment on April 2, 2019. Security camera footage shows a guy wearing the same hoodie Bill always wears who was roughly Bill’s height leaving Bill’s apartment complex, driving to the gas station and shooting Chuck at point blank range. Everyone agrees it was Bill who murdered Chuck. Except there’s one problem…
Bill was in Italy with his wife at that time. Bill presents flight receipts, restaurant receipts, hotel receipts, pictures, security footage from the hotel, and video footage of him on the beach the day of the murder. He has thoroughly falsified the idea that he was the cause of murdering Chuck.
“Well, until you can show us, who did murder Chuck, it must’ve been Bill” says the judge, jury, and plaintiff.
Isn’t that absurd? Well, that’s what happens when someone says “well since you can’t tell me what did cause [Y], it must’ve been a virus.”
The burden of proof lies on the individual bringing forth the positive claim (the individual saying X causes Y). That is a maxim of law. And those who show that X has never been demonstrated to cause Y, show that X hasn’t even been shown to exist, are not required to come up with a better explanation, irrespective of how many people wrongly believe it to be so.
In the court case with Albert, Bill and Chuck, assuming everyone is worth their salt, they’d be okay with not knowing, and they’d do their damnedest to continue exploring in order to find the truth about what causes Y.
The "no virus" camp has admitted that chickenpox seems to be the one illness that does point to an infectious agent as the culprit - eve, n if they don't believe it is a virus. I do not believe the "no virus" people have the holy grail as they believe. To me it is not either "germ theory" or "no virus" - there is truth in both. Terrain theory is certainly true. The health of our bodies and systems is what determines if we get sick, not tiny germs. However, to say that this proves there is no such thing as viruses and that germ theory is 100% wrong is a leap that is not supported by the evidence. Complex questions like this are rarely "either or", they are almost always "yes, and"
Michael - I’ve been in this camp for years now. Never heard of chicken pox being one that has an infectious agent. We are electrical beings, water is a transmitter of information, and resonance is transmitted, not a germ. This applies to all experiences of contagion. Thie resonance has been demonstrated by Luc Montangnier in a beaker experiment described in The Contagion Myth by Dr Tom Cowan.
If the RE were to be won back - would it be as ridiculous as before to secure it - or even worse - like the supposed medical exemption that schools are allowed to refuse?
In my opinion this is where we will need some help from the feds. We have many more strategies besides this one that are coming out soon - in time. But we need to fight this on multiple levels with multiple strategies.
Here is a short 2 page paper from the New England Medical Monthly from 1900 describing what the germ actually does by Dr. Henry Rogers: https://drsambailey.com/downloads/
Finally, please check out the other options given in Libre Office for the red-underlined word "vaccinology"........there is only one other option.....
The only immunity that vaccines offer are to the manufacturer and the government and companies that mandate them.
Diseases didn't decline due to vaccines. They were already extremely low before the vaccines were "made".
https://learntherisk.org/vaccines/diseases
I contend that vaccines don't work at all and actually increase sickness... Even the older ones.
Personally I do believe multiple toxins in vaccines make people sick - and so do the antigens at times. However some vaccines do stop the wide spread circulation of specific infections. In particular the measles and varicella (chickenpox) shots do seem to stop the wild virus from circulating.
That is probably NOT a good thing (for many reasons) but it does seem to be the reality we live in today.
I worked in NYC schools for 14 years, and not once did I see a single case of chicken pox. I've seen science teacher do informal surveys of their classes on this topic and they would find 1 in 200 students had ever gotten chicken pox - or sometimes had ever even heard of the disease.
The medical freedom movement really should be extremely critical and honest of all the facts as they present themselves. It doesn't help us to over-state beliefs as facts in my opinion.
It's a great point that no difference in health outcomes is seen when comparing states with exemptions to states without them. There's your undeniable proof. Brilliant!
Great to see a bill finally addressing RE. Contacted them and as always praying for the corruption to end in NY state.
Per D Alex Zeck post 12/2024:
When people say:
“I was sicker than I ever was. That proves it was a virus”, or “I lost my taste and smell. That proves it was a virus”, or “Sally and Johnny both got sick at a chickenpox party. That proves it was a virus”, they are committing 3 logical fallacies in one:
Begging the question,
a reification fallacy,
and affirming the consequent.
In order to say that X causes Y, you must first prove the existence of X. X, in the case of virology, hasn’t been proven.
You can’t assume that X exists (begging the question), then proceed to assign characteristics, properties, or behaviors to it (a reification fallacy), and then point to effects as proof of the cause (affirming the consequent).
Further, just because we don’t know with certainty what did cause Y (and we have plenty of plausible explanations), doesn’t mean we revert back to accepting the unproven (arguably disproven) premise that X causes Y because we don’t know the true culprit. Falsification doesn’t require a replacement.
Saying “well since you can’t tell me what did cause [Y], it must’ve been a virus” is equivalent to this:
Albert says he saw Bill murder Chuck at the gas station down the street from Bill’s apartment on April 2, 2019. Security camera footage shows a guy wearing the same hoodie Bill always wears who was roughly Bill’s height leaving Bill’s apartment complex, driving to the gas station and shooting Chuck at point blank range. Everyone agrees it was Bill who murdered Chuck. Except there’s one problem…
Bill was in Italy with his wife at that time. Bill presents flight receipts, restaurant receipts, hotel receipts, pictures, security footage from the hotel, and video footage of him on the beach the day of the murder. He has thoroughly falsified the idea that he was the cause of murdering Chuck.
“Well, until you can show us, who did murder Chuck, it must’ve been Bill” says the judge, jury, and plaintiff.
Isn’t that absurd? Well, that’s what happens when someone says “well since you can’t tell me what did cause [Y], it must’ve been a virus.”
The burden of proof lies on the individual bringing forth the positive claim (the individual saying X causes Y). That is a maxim of law. And those who show that X has never been demonstrated to cause Y, show that X hasn’t even been shown to exist, are not required to come up with a better explanation, irrespective of how many people wrongly believe it to be so.
In the court case with Albert, Bill and Chuck, assuming everyone is worth their salt, they’d be okay with not knowing, and they’d do their damnedest to continue exploring in order to find the truth about what causes Y.
So what will you do?
The "no virus" camp has admitted that chickenpox seems to be the one illness that does point to an infectious agent as the culprit - eve, n if they don't believe it is a virus. I do not believe the "no virus" people have the holy grail as they believe. To me it is not either "germ theory" or "no virus" - there is truth in both. Terrain theory is certainly true. The health of our bodies and systems is what determines if we get sick, not tiny germs. However, to say that this proves there is no such thing as viruses and that germ theory is 100% wrong is a leap that is not supported by the evidence. Complex questions like this are rarely "either or", they are almost always "yes, and"
Michael - I’ve been in this camp for years now. Never heard of chicken pox being one that has an infectious agent. We are electrical beings, water is a transmitter of information, and resonance is transmitted, not a germ. This applies to all experiences of contagion. Thie resonance has been demonstrated by Luc Montangnier in a beaker experiment described in The Contagion Myth by Dr Tom Cowan.
Even Cowan admits chicken pox "appears to be" from infection. And he's an ardent "NO VIRUS" guy (maybe the leader)
If the RE were to be won back - would it be as ridiculous as before to secure it - or even worse - like the supposed medical exemption that schools are allowed to refuse?
GREAT QUESTION!
In my opinion this is where we will need some help from the feds. We have many more strategies besides this one that are coming out soon - in time. But we need to fight this on multiple levels with multiple strategies.
The Amish did not fare well today - because “The religious exemption’s sweep had a far greater ability to undermine the State’s interest in preventing the spread of disease,” they said. https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/court-upholds-nys-repeal-of-religious-exmpts-to-school-jab-requirements/ The court holds an outdated, myopic view of how dis-ease appears to spread.
I'm thinking we may need to have this 42 page affidavit in our back pocket. It takes out the foundational basis, as no institution anywhere has been able to produce a purified sample of the virus to be able to sequence it and demonstrate that it causes dis-ease: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/2024-08-12-virus-FOIs-affidavit-NOTARTIZED-REDACTED.pdf
There is also the admission that the MMR itself causes "measles" in over 6% of recipients, as per the vaccine insert: https://
gskpro.com/content/dam/global/hcpportal/en_US/Prescribing_Information/Priorix/pdf/PRIORIX.PDF
Here is a short 2 page paper from the New England Medical Monthly from 1900 describing what the germ actually does by Dr. Henry Rogers: https://drsambailey.com/downloads/
Finally, please check out the other options given in Libre Office for the red-underlined word "vaccinology"........there is only one other option.....